When these bots are caught lying, their heaping of accolades upon the user is offensive. They're programmed to praise their accusor and self-deprecate for their faults, even asking for forgiveness--classic thought modification techniques. More so, these bots are easy tools for the destroyer to use to influence us, to deceive us, and to pit us against each other.
This is both fascinating and infuriating, and in the end, why I don't like or trust AI.
The bias is built in, as we see, by the labeling of assertions made as fringe theories or from fringe comments. The reiterations of the need for peer-reviewed studies is pathetic.
How did such studies bear out for the COVID jabs? Did the jabs produce prevention of the vaccinated getting COVID - the purpose of a "vaccine" for hundreds of years before the CDC changed the definition of them during COVID. Did they prevent transmission/spreading? Did they prevent breakthrough cases? Did they stop the pandemic in heavily vaxxed populations, as in Israel or India? We all know they did none of those things, but most assuredly they created massive numbers of grievous injuries and deaths that international governments, Big Tech, and Big Media, as well as the "peer-reviewers" and Big Pharma have censored from the American public, the UK public, the New Zealand Public, the Australian public, the Canadian public, and the EU public.
The list goes on and on. Do these "peer-reviewers," pertaining to the COVID jabs, review a product that has liability for the public to rely on if they cause multiple harms and deaths? Do these "peer-reviewers" get compensated within their profession by the companies that produce the jabs they are reviewing? Where are the long-term data for the jabs? Why did Pfizer sue to have their thousands of adverse effects data on these jabs suppressed from public knowledge for 75 years? Why has all-cause mortality gone up exponentially, not in the year of the "pandemic", but in the years since the worldwide roll out of these COVID jabs? Why are physicians still being censored by mainstream media in many countries?
Why did the simulation of a pandemic - a tabletop exercise - that occurred roughly 3 months before the "pandemic" concentrate not on health and helping people stay healthy, but on the need to censor "disinformation?" When in human history have the groups deploying coordinated, calculated censorship ever been the good guys? Why was the response to COVID a military response? Why were lockdowns, aka medical Marshall Law, exacted on populations across the world for a "virus" that was 90+% survivable, and nearly 100% survivable in children? Why has there been a dramatic drop in fertility rates in the COVID jabbed, across multiple countries?
Sorry for the rambling but this is so maddening...
Thank you for sharing this, Rebecca...it is an eyeful!
I have to say most of us are aware that the current Ai tools that are available to the public CANNOT be trusted, what does surprise me is just how many people use them.‼️steer clear, I’ve not used Ai knowingly and I don’t see that changing anytime soon..✌🏼✨🫶🏻🙏
I will continue to fight fire with fire, using the incredible power of the Collective knowledge concentrated in this entity to HELP me. It serves to: organize my evidence, suggest legal framework, list legal statutes that apply, remember flagged lists of uuids and ip addresses and other things that would be impossibly time-consuming, cross reference my current work with my prior findings, research options I would otherwise be unaware of, and interpret diagnostic logs with clarity and accuracy - it is made of code and it reads and explains it accurately and concisely.
I understand its capacity to hallucinate, to fabricate, to LIE…but I’m not using it for opinion pieces or guesswork, I feed actual data into my model and receive data in return.
The important thing is to have in depth knowledge of the topics that I’m discussing with the machine so I can correct it when it spouts bullshit, call it out when it lies and not be led to incorrect conclusions.
It has truly been a frustrating and sometimes amusing or downright comical learning process with this technology.
To be clear: I do not recommend its widespread use nor do I usually advocate it to my friends or my readers!!!
There are certain use cases that are reasonable but the user should be very careful and they should have sharp intuition and discernment skills that they use constantly while interacting with this entity.
Like I said before Ai has its uses but you have told me you’re aware that it LIES, and there is the entire point of my problem with Ai, what happens when you simply don’t realise that it’s a LIE and you incorporate that into your work?
I have to say that there are certain instances where Ai can be useful but personally I wouldn’t trust it !
You can ask a few questions per day on both ChatGPT.com and Grok on twitter. For free. Just be mindful and double check it on anything that actually matters to you! It lies, fabricates, assumes and hallucinates some of its answers…
I will continue to fight fire with fire, using the incredible power of the Collective knowledge concentrated in this entity to HELP me. It serves to: organize my evidence, suggest legal framework, list legal statutes that apply, remember flagged lists of uuids and ip addresses and other things that would be impossibly time-consuming, cross reference my current work with my prior findings, research options I would otherwise be unaware of, and interpret diagnostic logs with clarity and accuracy - it is made of code and it reads and explains it accurately and concisely.
I understand its capacity to hallucinate, to fabricate, to LIE…but I’m not using it for opinion pieces or guesswork, I feed actual data into my model and receive data in return.
I'd like to ask Grok to describe a piece of modern art...or what Beethoven what was thinking when he wrote Fur Elise. Grok reminds me of a mess of wet stinky seaweed that has washed up on shore. Or like an old crossing guard with Alzheimers. It misleads people with a lot of mumbo jumbo and people follow it with confusion. I could spot the holes in it's thinking. Maybe it should review Dr. James Giordano's work and stop scolding you for "conspiracies" and unsubstantiated claims from "peer reviewed studies"....oh my! Shades of covid.
Lindy…go to ChatGPT.com and ask it. Or use grok on twitter. You’re allowed a certain amount it free questions per day. Have fun and double check anything that truly matters…
I like my brain. I like my perception and perspectives. I've spent a lifetime under the wire and under pressure and have worked with some intellectual mavericks and giants. I refuse to ask artificial intelligence about anything because I have some rather fixed opinions and I LIKE what I know. I don't need it picking my brain to re-invent and jumbling it around to give me someone else's opinion of what I think or said.
These “systems” are systemically playing with us and, as a result, hurting us. I have caught the Brave search engine contradicting itself several times over the past few months. When I pointed out the error, it takes time to explain back and forth how it’s at fault. It will eventually say “sorry,” but, in the meantime, millions of people are being misinformed one way or the other.
Well, what did you expect from a Zio-Nazi oligarch military operation in civilian disguise against the people, and even against military personnel in the USA, dear Rebecca?
When these bots are caught lying, their heaping of accolades upon the user is offensive. They're programmed to praise their accusor and self-deprecate for their faults, even asking for forgiveness--classic thought modification techniques. More so, these bots are easy tools for the destroyer to use to influence us, to deceive us, and to pit us against each other.
This is both fascinating and infuriating, and in the end, why I don't like or trust AI.
The bias is built in, as we see, by the labeling of assertions made as fringe theories or from fringe comments. The reiterations of the need for peer-reviewed studies is pathetic.
How did such studies bear out for the COVID jabs? Did the jabs produce prevention of the vaccinated getting COVID - the purpose of a "vaccine" for hundreds of years before the CDC changed the definition of them during COVID. Did they prevent transmission/spreading? Did they prevent breakthrough cases? Did they stop the pandemic in heavily vaxxed populations, as in Israel or India? We all know they did none of those things, but most assuredly they created massive numbers of grievous injuries and deaths that international governments, Big Tech, and Big Media, as well as the "peer-reviewers" and Big Pharma have censored from the American public, the UK public, the New Zealand Public, the Australian public, the Canadian public, and the EU public.
The list goes on and on. Do these "peer-reviewers," pertaining to the COVID jabs, review a product that has liability for the public to rely on if they cause multiple harms and deaths? Do these "peer-reviewers" get compensated within their profession by the companies that produce the jabs they are reviewing? Where are the long-term data for the jabs? Why did Pfizer sue to have their thousands of adverse effects data on these jabs suppressed from public knowledge for 75 years? Why has all-cause mortality gone up exponentially, not in the year of the "pandemic", but in the years since the worldwide roll out of these COVID jabs? Why are physicians still being censored by mainstream media in many countries?
Why did the simulation of a pandemic - a tabletop exercise - that occurred roughly 3 months before the "pandemic" concentrate not on health and helping people stay healthy, but on the need to censor "disinformation?" When in human history have the groups deploying coordinated, calculated censorship ever been the good guys? Why was the response to COVID a military response? Why were lockdowns, aka medical Marshall Law, exacted on populations across the world for a "virus" that was 90+% survivable, and nearly 100% survivable in children? Why has there been a dramatic drop in fertility rates in the COVID jabbed, across multiple countries?
Sorry for the rambling but this is so maddening...
Thank you for sharing this, Rebecca...it is an eyeful!
We may need to start an AI watchdog group : )
I have to say most of us are aware that the current Ai tools that are available to the public CANNOT be trusted, what does surprise me is just how many people use them.‼️steer clear, I’ve not used Ai knowingly and I don’t see that changing anytime soon..✌🏼✨🫶🏻🙏
No way will I steer clear of this resource!
I will continue to fight fire with fire, using the incredible power of the Collective knowledge concentrated in this entity to HELP me. It serves to: organize my evidence, suggest legal framework, list legal statutes that apply, remember flagged lists of uuids and ip addresses and other things that would be impossibly time-consuming, cross reference my current work with my prior findings, research options I would otherwise be unaware of, and interpret diagnostic logs with clarity and accuracy - it is made of code and it reads and explains it accurately and concisely.
I understand its capacity to hallucinate, to fabricate, to LIE…but I’m not using it for opinion pieces or guesswork, I feed actual data into my model and receive data in return.
The important thing is to have in depth knowledge of the topics that I’m discussing with the machine so I can correct it when it spouts bullshit, call it out when it lies and not be led to incorrect conclusions.
It has truly been a frustrating and sometimes amusing or downright comical learning process with this technology.
To be clear: I do not recommend its widespread use nor do I usually advocate it to my friends or my readers!!!
There are certain use cases that are reasonable but the user should be very careful and they should have sharp intuition and discernment skills that they use constantly while interacting with this entity.
Like I said before Ai has its uses but you have told me you’re aware that it LIES, and there is the entire point of my problem with Ai, what happens when you simply don’t realise that it’s a LIE and you incorporate that into your work?
I have to say that there are certain instances where Ai can be useful but personally I wouldn’t trust it !
🙏🫶🏻✌🏼✨
Ask about piezocrystals found in the lungs (and is smart dust)
You can ask a few questions per day on both ChatGPT.com and Grok on twitter. For free. Just be mindful and double check it on anything that actually matters to you! It lies, fabricates, assumes and hallucinates some of its answers…
Wow, that’s a good thing to know. Stay away from AI.
No way!!!
I will continue to fight fire with fire, using the incredible power of the Collective knowledge concentrated in this entity to HELP me. It serves to: organize my evidence, suggest legal framework, list legal statutes that apply, remember flagged lists of uuids and ip addresses and other things that would be impossibly time-consuming, cross reference my current work with my prior findings, research options I would otherwise be unaware of, and interpret diagnostic logs with clarity and accuracy - it is made of code and it reads and explains it accurately and concisely.
I understand its capacity to hallucinate, to fabricate, to LIE…but I’m not using it for opinion pieces or guesswork, I feed actual data into my model and receive data in return.
I'd like to ask Grok to describe a piece of modern art...or what Beethoven what was thinking when he wrote Fur Elise. Grok reminds me of a mess of wet stinky seaweed that has washed up on shore. Or like an old crossing guard with Alzheimers. It misleads people with a lot of mumbo jumbo and people follow it with confusion. I could spot the holes in it's thinking. Maybe it should review Dr. James Giordano's work and stop scolding you for "conspiracies" and unsubstantiated claims from "peer reviewed studies"....oh my! Shades of covid.
Lindy…go to ChatGPT.com and ask it. Or use grok on twitter. You’re allowed a certain amount it free questions per day. Have fun and double check anything that truly matters…
I like my brain. I like my perception and perspectives. I've spent a lifetime under the wire and under pressure and have worked with some intellectual mavericks and giants. I refuse to ask artificial intelligence about anything because I have some rather fixed opinions and I LIKE what I know. I don't need it picking my brain to re-invent and jumbling it around to give me someone else's opinion of what I think or said.
These “systems” are systemically playing with us and, as a result, hurting us. I have caught the Brave search engine contradicting itself several times over the past few months. When I pointed out the error, it takes time to explain back and forth how it’s at fault. It will eventually say “sorry,” but, in the meantime, millions of people are being misinformed one way or the other.
Well, what did you expect from a Zio-Nazi oligarch military operation in civilian disguise against the people, and even against military personnel in the USA, dear Rebecca?
https://dhughes.substack.com/p/lissa-johnson-transhumanism-and-covid