I imagine it could be a filament of some kind. Possibly it could be the different pressure on the different sides causing that movement of blood? Have you seen many filaments, and blinking lights, like Dr Ana Maria Mihalcea?
My findings are shockingly diverse. Dozens of technologies that I have matched to their respective patents, peer reviewed literature and research papers are shown side by side in shocking comparison: see the post pinned to my stack called “microtechnology, synthetic biology and me!”
Yes, plenty of filaments. No blinking lights because I am not using dark-field effects or filters. But I have used black lights and the things that glow are numerous. See my recent post titled “pelagic aquatic luminous sensors”.
Very intriuging footage Bec, if I was to take a stab at it, it very much seems to being influenced by magnetic forces? or emf localised to where your workspace is.
Sometimes in life we need to go the distance with other folks until we truly know what their stuff is made of. Take care, keep at it, learn what you can from the pool of others discoveries.
I have, thanks! I have reached out to Mattjaob a couple times attempting to tell him that I had identified specific pieces of microtechnology in his work- specifically a multi walled carbon nanotube, microfluidic channels and an interferometer - I got zero response so I gave up.
I just gotta say this too: KarlC doesn’t know shit. He writes page after page of non-information simply describing the images he posts. This tells us nothing at all. He tells me that I need to use “staines and dies” for people to take me seriously while freely admitting that he doesn’t know what the results of his experiments with methylene blue “implicates”. Lol, I think he meant “indicates”. He tells me that using comparisons accomplishes nothing and that I can’t rely on shape and size and then in the same sentence said that he uses morphology and scale in his work. LOL!
Anyone giving this grifter money is wasting their money and watching his interviews is a total waste of time. But he does have some pretty pictures, no doubt. He also shows video of a specific reaction that freaked him out - that dark field reaction was a specific one that I can’t remember off the top of my head but when I tried to tell him to check in to it I found that I was blocked; apparently the other amateur microscopists think I’m too much of a bitch to work with and he says that is why they ignore my work. Fuck ‘em.
They’re all a bunch of PAY-triots. Anyone using paywalls in this time of death - rather than freely sharing information that could save lives or help to heal people should be ashamed of themselves. All it serves to do is further segregate an already compartmentalized echo-chamber into the haves and have-nots.
Keep punching ❤️🔥 This thing goes down eventually, and the hits are cumulative.
I imagine it could be a filament of some kind. Possibly it could be the different pressure on the different sides causing that movement of blood? Have you seen many filaments, and blinking lights, like Dr Ana Maria Mihalcea?
My findings are shockingly diverse. Dozens of technologies that I have matched to their respective patents, peer reviewed literature and research papers are shown side by side in shocking comparison: see the post pinned to my stack called “microtechnology, synthetic biology and me!”
Yes, plenty of filaments. No blinking lights because I am not using dark-field effects or filters. But I have used black lights and the things that glow are numerous. See my recent post titled “pelagic aquatic luminous sensors”.
Very intriuging footage Bec, if I was to take a stab at it, it very much seems to being influenced by magnetic forces? or emf localised to where your workspace is.
Sometimes in life we need to go the distance with other folks until we truly know what their stuff is made of. Take care, keep at it, learn what you can from the pool of others discoveries.
Keep sharing and everyone seeing this, keep archiving. The truth is too big to stay contained forever.
See Matt’s Substack:
https://woodnstone820.substack.com/
Silvia has also identified many of these critters:
https://sam368.substack.com/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=web&utm_campaign=substack_profile
Karl and David are also key microscopists from the start:
https://substack.com/@davidnixon
And Will has, among other micrographs, an extended repertoire of fibres:
https://micronaut.substack.com/
Have fun exploring their tremendous work!
Best.
I have, thanks! I have reached out to Mattjaob a couple times attempting to tell him that I had identified specific pieces of microtechnology in his work- specifically a multi walled carbon nanotube, microfluidic channels and an interferometer - I got zero response so I gave up.
I just gotta say this too: KarlC doesn’t know shit. He writes page after page of non-information simply describing the images he posts. This tells us nothing at all. He tells me that I need to use “staines and dies” for people to take me seriously while freely admitting that he doesn’t know what the results of his experiments with methylene blue “implicates”. Lol, I think he meant “indicates”. He tells me that using comparisons accomplishes nothing and that I can’t rely on shape and size and then in the same sentence said that he uses morphology and scale in his work. LOL!
Anyone giving this grifter money is wasting their money and watching his interviews is a total waste of time. But he does have some pretty pictures, no doubt. He also shows video of a specific reaction that freaked him out - that dark field reaction was a specific one that I can’t remember off the top of my head but when I tried to tell him to check in to it I found that I was blocked; apparently the other amateur microscopists think I’m too much of a bitch to work with and he says that is why they ignore my work. Fuck ‘em.
Sorry to hear you had so many bad experiences so far.
So, be strong and do what you have to do, no matter what. :)
Thank you!
He works with David Nixon so I don't think he's a grifter
They’re all a bunch of PAY-triots. Anyone using paywalls in this time of death - rather than freely sharing information that could save lives or help to heal people should be ashamed of themselves. All it serves to do is further segregate an already compartmentalized echo-chamber into the haves and have-nots.
well Karen Kingston does & I know she is the real deal.
She is the real deal. And she is definitely profiting off her notoriety. Which is shameful.